With AI 2.0 reshaping industries, selecting the right framework to guide AI adaptation is more critical than ever—get it wrong, and your AI initiatives may stall before they even begin. It’s not just about picking a system for implementing AI technologies—it’s about ensuring that the framework also supports the cultural transformation required for success. Without addressing culture, even the most advanced AI projects can fall short.
In my previous articles, "Creating an AI-Ready Culture" and "Why Companies Should Start Preparing for an AI-Ready Culture Now", I delved into why cultural adaptation is critical for AI initiatives. If you haven’t read them yet, I encourage you to check them out to understand the foundational role that culture plays in AI success. With that in mind, let’s explore how selecting the right framework plays into this process.
Key Considerations When Selecting a Framework
When selecting a framework for AI adaptation, there are several key factors that should guide your decision. A framework must do more than just support the technical aspects of AI integration—it needs to assist with managing the cultural, operational, and long-term strategic changes that AI brings to your organization. Here’s what you should look for:
Cultural Alignment: The framework must prioritize cultural transformation alongside AI adoption. AI requires new ways of working, and without proper cultural alignment, initiatives will struggle. The framework should ensure that employees understand how AI impacts their roles, and it must help foster collaboration across departments to smooth the cultural shift.
End-to-End Coverage: It’s crucial that the framework takes a holistic view, supporting the transformation from initial development to deployment and beyond. AI adaptation is an ongoing journey, so the framework should provide comprehensive guidance across all stages—ensuring the technology remains integrated with business goals over time.
Job Function Changes: As AI transforms traditional roles and introduces new responsibilities, the framework needs to address job function changes. It should provide a clear structure for how to redefine roles and responsibilities as certain tasks become automated or augmented by AI technologies.
Change Management and Upskilling: Implementing AI brings significant change, not only in technology but also in employee skill sets. The framework should include change management strategies and support upskilling and training programs to ensure employees are equipped to work with AI. This is essential for reducing resistance to AI and fostering a culture of continuous learning.
Monitoring and Measuring Changes: The framework must provide robust tools for monitoring and measuring the impact of adaptation. This includes tracking performance improvements, assessing the effectiveness of cultural adaptation, and evaluating how well AI is integrated into daily operations. Additionally, it should continuously monitor market trends, new AI advancements, and emerging technologies, ensuring the organization stays aligned with the rapidly evolving AI landscape.
Data Protection and Security Policies: A robust AI framework should also provide clear guidelines for data protection and security. As AI systems often handle sensitive data, it is crucial that the framework ensures compliance with data privacy regulations and establishes safeguards to protect against breaches, ensuring the highest standards for safeguarding information.
Continuous Improvement: Lastly, the framework should emphasize continuous improvement. AI is not a one-time project—it’s a continuous journey that requires frequent evaluations and adjustments. The framework should guide long-term strategy and combine both cultural and technological advancement, ensuring your organization adapts as the technology and market evolve.
A Good Use Case: ITIL 4.0 as an Example of a Strong Framework
One example of a framework that addresses these considerations well is ITIL 4.0. While ITIL is traditionally known for managing IT services, it also offers the structure needed to navigate the complexities of AI adaptation and cultural transformation.
The ITIL 4.0 framework is built around several dimensions that help guide both the technical and cultural aspects of AI adoption:
Organizations and People: Focuses on human skills and collaboration. It ensures that people, not just technology, are at the heart of the AI transformation.
Information and Technology: Aligns AI technologies with broader business goals, ensuring they are used effectively and sustainably across the organization.
Partners and Suppliers: Facilitates strong relationships with external vendors and partners, which is crucial for AI deployment and long-term success.
Value Streams and Processes: Encourages continuous improvement and workflow alignment, helping organizations refine their processes as they learn from AI implementation.
In addition to these four dimensions, ITIL 4.0’s 34 Practices, divided into three categories—General Management, Service Management, and Technical Management—cover all seven of the key considerations when selecting a framework, such as cultural alignment, job function changes, and continuous improvement, among others. For more details on how these practices address the full scope of AI adaptation, feel free to refer to my book, A Quick Guide for IT Organizations: AI 2.0 Adaptation Through ITIL 4.0. I won’t elaborate here, as the explanation would be quite extensive.
A Less Suitable Use Case: Agile as a Master Framework
On the other hand, while Agile is often praised for its flexibility and speed, it’s not as well-suited as a master framework for cultural adaptation, especially in larger, more complex AI transformations. Agile’s short-term focus can undermine the long-term vision required for a successful AI transformation that integrates cultural shifts.
Here are some reasons why Agile alone may not work well for cultural adaptation:
Short-term focus vs. long-term change: Agile operates in short sprints, which work well for specific, quick projects, but AI adaptation requires long-term planning and cultural shifts that extend beyond short development cycles.
Team-centric, not organization-wide: Agile focuses heavily on the autonomy of small teams, but cultural transformation requires organization-wide alignment, where leadership, communication, and collaboration across departments are critical.
Decentralized leadership: Agile’s decentralized approach may lead to inconsistency in how cultural changes are implemented. Cultural transformation needs clear leadership to ensure cohesive and lasting change.
That said, Agile can still be a valuable subset within a broader framework. For example, Agile’s strength lies in:
Rapid prototyping and iterative development, which can be useful for testing AI tools on a smaller scale before full rollout.
Quick feedback loops, which allow teams to pivot quickly if something isn’t working.
But as a master framework, Agile doesn’t provide the necessary structure for managing the big-picture cultural transformation required for successful AI integration.
Conclusion: No Silver Bullet—Find What Works for You
There’s no single, perfect framework for AI adaptation, and what works best will depend on your organization’s unique needs, goals, and culture. The key takeaway is that you need a framework that not only supports the technical side of AI but also drives cultural alignment.
Whether you’re considering frameworks like ITIL 4.0 or others, the most important thing is to choose one that helps guide your AI roadmap while fostering the cultural change required for long-term success. Ultimately, the best strategy is the one that works for your organization—one that combines culture and strategy seamlessly and offers continuous improvement as AI evolves.
If you're curious about which framework could be the best fit for your AI journey, feel free to reach out. I’d love to hear your thoughts and help you explore what might work best for your company.
Comments